Day 39 信贷数据集神经网络训练
2026/6/16 9:34:01 网站建设 项目流程

文章目录

  • Day 39 · 信贷数据集神经网络训练
    • 一、数据预处理
    • 二、构建 DataLoader 与神经网络
    • 三、可视化
      • Dropout 模型表现
    • 四、小结

Day 39 · 信贷数据集神经网络训练

importpandasaspdimportnumpyasnpimporttorchimporttorch.nnasnnimporttorch.optimasoptimimportmatplotlib.pyplotaspltfromsklearn.model_selectionimporttrain_test_splitimportwarningsimportrandom warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')# 忽略警告信息defset_seed(seed:int=42):random.seed(seed)np.random.seed(seed)torch.manual_seed(seed)torch.cuda.manual_seed_all(seed)torch.backends.cudnn.deterministic=Truetorch.backends.cudnn.benchmark=Falseset_seed(42)data=pd.read_csv('../data.csv')data.head()
IdHome OwnershipAnnual IncomeYears in current jobTax LiensNumber of Open AccountsYears of Credit HistoryMaximum Open CreditNumber of Credit ProblemsMonths since last delinquentBankruptciesPurposeTermCurrent Loan AmountCurrent Credit BalanceMonthly DebtCredit ScoreCredit Default
00Own Home482087.0NaN0.011.026.3685960.01.0NaN1.0debt consolidationShort Term99999999.047386.07914.0749.00
11Own Home1025487.010+ years0.015.015.31181730.00.0NaN0.0debt consolidationLong Term264968.0394972.018373.0737.01
22Home Mortgage751412.08 years0.011.035.01182434.00.0NaN0.0debt consolidationShort Term99999999.0308389.013651.0742.00
33Own Home805068.06 years0.08.022.5147400.01.0NaN1.0debt consolidationShort Term121396.095855.011338.0694.00
44Rent776264.08 years0.013.013.6385836.01.0NaN0.0debt consolidationShort Term125840.093309.07180.0719.00

一、数据预处理

discrete_features=data.select_dtypes(include=['object']).columns.tolist()print(discrete_features)maps={'Home Ownership':{'Own Home':1,'Rent':2,'Have Mortgage':3,'Home Mortgage':4},'Years in current job':{'< 1 year':1,'1 year':2,'2 years':3,'3 years':4,'4 years':5,'5 years':6,'6 years':7,'7 years':8,'8 years':9,'9 years':10,'10+ years':11},'Term':{'Short Term':0,'Long Term':1}}data=data.replace(maps)# Purpose 独热编码,记得需要将bool类型转换为数值data=pd.get_dummies(data,columns=['Purpose'])data2=pd.read_csv('../data.csv')list_diff=data.columns.difference(data2.columns)data[list_diff]=data[list_diff].astype(int)data.rename(columns={'Term':'Long Term'},inplace=True)# 重命名列continuous_features=data.select_dtypes(include=['int64','float64']).columns.tolist()#把筛选出来的列名转换成列表# 连续特征用中位数补全forfeatureincontinuous_features:mode_value=data[feature].mode()[0]#获取该列的众数。data[feature].fillna(mode_value,inplace=True)#用众数填充该列的缺失值,inplace=True表示直接在原数据上修改。X=data.drop(['Credit Default','Id'],axis=1)# 特征,axis=1表示按列删除y=data['Credit Default']# 标签# 按照8:2划分训练集和测试集X_train,X_test,y_train,y_test=train_test_split(X,y,test_size=0.2,random_state=42)# 80%训练集,20%测试集
['Home Ownership', 'Years in current job', 'Purpose', 'Term']
fromsklearn.preprocessingimportStandardScaler scaler=StandardScaler()X_train=scaler.fit_transform(X_train)X_test=scaler.transform(X_test)print(X_train.shape)print(X_test.shape)print(y_train.shape)print(y_test.shape)
(6000, 30) (1500, 30) (6000,) (1500,)

二、构建 DataLoader 与神经网络

  1. train_loadertest_loader设置可选的 pinned memory,方便 GPU 加速。
  2. 在每个 epoch 结束后,对训练集与测试集分别计算损失和准确率,并保存下来用于可视化。
  3. 打印定期的监控日志,便于观察收敛情况。
fromtorch.utils.dataimportDataLoader,TensorDataset device=torch.device('cuda:0'iftorch.cuda.is_available()else'cpu')pin_memory=device.type=='cuda'X_train=torch.FloatTensor(X_train)y_train=torch.FloatTensor(y_train.to_numpy()).unsqueeze(1)X_test=torch.FloatTensor(X_test)y_test=torch.FloatTensor(y_test.to_numpy()).unsqueeze(1)print(X_train.shape)print(X_test.shape)print(y_train.shape)print(y_test.shape)print('---------------------------------')train_dataset=TensorDataset(X_train,y_train)test_dataset=TensorDataset(X_test,y_test)train_loader=DataLoader(train_dataset,batch_size=64,shuffle=True,pin_memory=pin_memory)test_loader=DataLoader(test_dataset,batch_size=256,shuffle=False,pin_memory=pin_memory)model=nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(X_train.shape[1],64),nn.ReLU(),nn.Linear(64,32),nn.ReLU(),nn.Linear(32,1)).to(device)criterion=nn.BCEWithLogitsLoss()optimizer=optim.Adam(model.parameters(),lr=1e-3)num_epochs=300train_losses,test_losses=[],[]train_accuracies,test_accuracies=[],[]forepochinrange(1,num_epochs+1):model.train()running_loss=0.0running_correct=0total_train=0forx_batch,y_batchintrain_loader:x_batch=x_batch.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)y_batch=y_batch.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)optimizer.zero_grad()outputs=model(x_batch)loss=criterion(outputs,y_batch)loss.backward()optimizer.step()running_loss+=loss.item()*x_batch.size(0)preds=(torch.sigmoid(outputs)>0.5).int()running_correct+=(preds==y_batch.int()).sum().item()total_train+=x_batch.size(0)avg_train_loss=running_loss/total_train avg_train_acc=running_correct/total_train train_losses.append(avg_train_loss)train_accuracies.append(avg_train_acc)model.eval()test_loss=0.0test_correct=0total_test=0withtorch.no_grad():forx_batch,y_batchintest_loader:x_batch=x_batch.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)y_batch=y_batch.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)outputs=model(x_batch)loss=criterion(outputs,y_batch)test_loss+=loss.item()*x_batch.size(0)preds=(torch.sigmoid(outputs)>0.5).int()test_correct+=(preds==y_batch.int()).sum().item()total_test+=x_batch.size(0)avg_test_loss=test_loss/total_test avg_test_acc=test_correct/total_test test_losses.append(avg_test_loss)test_accuracies.append(avg_test_acc)ifepoch%20==0orepoch==1:print(f'Epoch [{epoch:03d}/{num_epochs}] | 'f'Train Loss:{avg_train_loss:.4f}, Train Acc:{avg_train_acc:.4f}| 'f'Test Loss:{avg_test_loss:.4f}, Test Acc:{avg_test_acc:.4f}')print(f'Final Test Accuracy:{test_accuracies[-1]:.4f}')
torch.Size([6000, 30]) torch.Size([1500, 30]) torch.Size([6000, 1]) torch.Size([1500, 1]) --------------------------------- Epoch [001/300] | Train Loss: 0.5566, Train Acc: 0.7417 | Test Loss: 0.5053, Test Acc: 0.7673 Epoch [020/300] | Train Loss: 0.4383, Train Acc: 0.7883 | Test Loss: 0.4872, Test Acc: 0.7587 Epoch [040/300] | Train Loss: 0.4183, Train Acc: 0.7990 | Test Loss: 0.4940, Test Acc: 0.7540 Epoch [060/300] | Train Loss: 0.3951, Train Acc: 0.8105 | Test Loss: 0.5158, Test Acc: 0.7500 Epoch [080/300] | Train Loss: 0.3816, Train Acc: 0.8165 | Test Loss: 0.5445, Test Acc: 0.7560 Epoch [100/300] | Train Loss: 0.3640, Train Acc: 0.8263 | Test Loss: 0.5684, Test Acc: 0.7560 Epoch [120/300] | Train Loss: 0.3565, Train Acc: 0.8320 | Test Loss: 0.5776, Test Acc: 0.7220 Epoch [140/300] | Train Loss: 0.3459, Train Acc: 0.8402 | Test Loss: 0.5914, Test Acc: 0.7213 Epoch [160/300] | Train Loss: 0.3373, Train Acc: 0.8432 | Test Loss: 0.6063, Test Acc: 0.7400 Epoch [180/300] | Train Loss: 0.3273, Train Acc: 0.8488 | Test Loss: 0.6210, Test Acc: 0.7427 Epoch [200/300] | Train Loss: 0.3175, Train Acc: 0.8558 | Test Loss: 0.6753, Test Acc: 0.7007 Epoch [220/300] | Train Loss: 0.3103, Train Acc: 0.8628 | Test Loss: 0.6701, Test Acc: 0.7233 Epoch [240/300] | Train Loss: 0.3035, Train Acc: 0.8618 | Test Loss: 0.6862, Test Acc: 0.7060 Epoch [260/300] | Train Loss: 0.2984, Train Acc: 0.8628 | Test Loss: 0.7258, Test Acc: 0.7120 Epoch [280/300] | Train Loss: 0.2891, Train Acc: 0.8730 | Test Loss: 0.7432, Test Acc: 0.7213 Epoch [300/300] | Train Loss: 0.2828, Train Acc: 0.8750 | Test Loss: 0.7428, Test Acc: 0.7220 Final Test Accuracy: 0.7220

三、可视化

下图左侧展示损失曲线,右侧展示准确率曲线。

epochs=range(1,num_epochs+1)fig,axes=plt.subplots(1,2,figsize=(14,5))axes[0].plot(epochs,train_losses,label='Train Loss')axes[0].plot(epochs,test_losses,label='Test Loss')axes[0].set_xlabel('Epoch')axes[0].set_ylabel('Loss')axes[0].set_title('Train vs Test Loss')axes[0].legend()axes[1].plot(epochs,train_accuracies,label='Train Acc')axes[1].plot(epochs,test_accuracies,label='Test Acc')axes[1].set_xlabel('Epoch')axes[1].set_ylabel('Accuracy')axes[1].set_title('Train vs Test Accuracy')axes[1].legend()plt.tight_layout()plt.show()


可以看到,模型在测试集上的表现极差。过拟合很严重。接下来,我们来尝试使用Dropout来减缓过拟合。

# 使用 Dropout + L2 正则重新训练,缓解过拟合set_seed(42)# 确保第二次实验也可复现drop_model=nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(X_train.shape[1],128),nn.ReLU(),nn.Dropout(0.3),nn.Linear(128,64),nn.ReLU(),nn.Dropout(0.3),nn.Linear(64,1)).to(device)weight_decay=1e-4drop_optimizer=optim.Adam(drop_model.parameters(),lr=1e-3,weight_decay=weight_decay)drop_epochs=200drop_train_losses,drop_test_losses=[],[]drop_train_accs,drop_test_accs=[],[]forepochinrange(1,drop_epochs+1):drop_model.train()running_loss=0.0running_correct=0total=0forxb,ybintrain_loader:xb=xb.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)yb=yb.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)drop_optimizer.zero_grad()logits=drop_model(xb)loss=criterion(logits,yb)loss.backward()drop_optimizer.step()running_loss+=loss.item()*xb.size(0)preds=(torch.sigmoid(logits)>0.5).int()running_correct+=(preds==yb.int()).sum().item()total+=xb.size(0)train_loss=running_loss/total train_acc=running_correct/total drop_train_losses.append(train_loss)drop_train_accs.append(train_acc)drop_model.eval()test_loss=0.0test_correct=0total_test=0withtorch.no_grad():forxb,ybintest_loader:xb=xb.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)yb=yb.to(device,non_blocking=pin_memory)logits=drop_model(xb)loss=criterion(logits,yb)test_loss+=loss.item()*xb.size(0)preds=(torch.sigmoid(logits)>0.5).int()test_correct+=(preds==yb.int()).sum().item()total_test+=xb.size(0)avg_test_loss=test_loss/total_test avg_test_acc=test_correct/total_test drop_test_losses.append(avg_test_loss)drop_test_accs.append(avg_test_acc)ifepoch%20==0orepoch==1:print(f'Dropout Epoch [{epoch:03d}/{drop_epochs}] | 'f'Train Loss:{train_loss:.4f}, Train Acc:{train_acc:.4f}| 'f'Test Loss:{avg_test_loss:.4f}, Test Acc:{avg_test_acc:.4f}')print(f'Final Test Accuracy with Dropout/L2:{drop_test_accs[-1]:.4f}')
Dropout Epoch [001/200] | Train Loss: 0.5564, Train Acc: 0.7473 | Test Loss: 0.4935, Test Acc: 0.7667 Dropout Epoch [020/200] | Train Loss: 0.4507, Train Acc: 0.7858 | Test Loss: 0.4711, Test Acc: 0.7647 Dropout Epoch [040/200] | Train Loss: 0.4392, Train Acc: 0.7872 | Test Loss: 0.4743, Test Acc: 0.7620 Dropout Epoch [060/200] | Train Loss: 0.4284, Train Acc: 0.7978 | Test Loss: 0.4817, Test Acc: 0.7593 Dropout Epoch [080/200] | Train Loss: 0.4182, Train Acc: 0.8008 | Test Loss: 0.4826, Test Acc: 0.7553 Dropout Epoch [100/200] | Train Loss: 0.4133, Train Acc: 0.8065 | Test Loss: 0.4929, Test Acc: 0.7547 Dropout Epoch [120/200] | Train Loss: 0.4085, Train Acc: 0.8067 | Test Loss: 0.4951, Test Acc: 0.7533 Dropout Epoch [140/200] | Train Loss: 0.3974, Train Acc: 0.8135 | Test Loss: 0.5040, Test Acc: 0.7580 Dropout Epoch [160/200] | Train Loss: 0.3925, Train Acc: 0.8173 | Test Loss: 0.5158, Test Acc: 0.7533 Dropout Epoch [180/200] | Train Loss: 0.3872, Train Acc: 0.8178 | Test Loss: 0.5231, Test Acc: 0.7533 Dropout Epoch [200/200] | Train Loss: 0.3828, Train Acc: 0.8220 | Test Loss: 0.5193, Test Acc: 0.7480 Final Test Accuracy with Dropout/L2: 0.7480

Dropout 模型表现

再绘制一次损失/准确率曲线,观察正则化后的收敛情况。

drop_epochs_range=range(1,drop_epochs+1)fig,axes=plt.subplots(1,2,figsize=(14,5))axes[0].plot(drop_epochs_range,drop_train_losses,label='Drop Train Loss')axes[0].plot(drop_epochs_range,drop_test_losses,label='Drop Test Loss')axes[0].set_xlabel('Epoch')axes[0].set_ylabel('Loss')axes[0].set_title('Dropout Model Loss')axes[0].legend()axes[1].plot(drop_epochs_range,drop_train_accs,label='Drop Train Acc')axes[1].plot(drop_epochs_range,drop_test_accs,label='Drop Test Acc')axes[1].set_xlabel('Epoch')axes[1].set_ylabel('Accuracy')axes[1].set_title('Dropout Model Accuracy')axes[1].legend()plt.tight_layout()plt.show()

四、小结

  • 我天,效果更差了。(ㄒ o ㄒ)
  • 第一阶段模型有明显的过拟合迹象,因此又用 Dropout + L2 重新训练,记录了第二组损失/准确率曲线。结果效果更差了(。ŏ﹏ŏ)。本人才疏学浅,先这样吧,之后再来研究一下是为啥吧。
  • 之后继续在正则化、网络深度、学习率调度或早停等方向尝试。

@浙大疏锦行

需要专业的网站建设服务?

联系我们获取免费的网站建设咨询和方案报价,让我们帮助您实现业务目标

立即咨询